FTC_v._Colgate-Palmolive_Co.

<i>FTC v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.</i>

FTC v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.

1965 United States Supreme Court case

Federal Trade Commission v. Colgate-Palmolive Company, 380 U.S. 374 (1965), was a United States Supreme Court case.

Quick Facts Federal Trade Commission v. Colgate-Palmolive Company, Argued December 10, 1964 Decided April 5th, 1965 ...

Background

A Colgate-Palmolive advertisement claimed that its Palmolive Rapid Shave shaving cream was so good it could be used to shave sandpaper. The commercial showed sandpaper applied with shaving cream and then shaved.

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) complained that the ad was deceptive and a material misrepresentation because it was not sandpaper but rather sand sprinkled on glass. Colgate-Palmolive argued that the product really could shave sandpaper if left on long enough. Colgate-Palmolive sued arguing that the FTC had overstepped its authority.[1]

Opinion of the Court

The Supreme Court agreed with the FTC that the commercial was a material misrepresentation. The ruling forced advertisers to remain truthful in their product presentations. As a result, commercials often feature "dramatization" notifications.[2]

References

  1. [1]
    Richards, Jef I. (1990). Deceptive Advertising: Behavioral Study of a Legal Concept. L. Erlbaum Associates. ISBN 978-0-8058-0649-6.
  2. [2]
    "FTC v. Colgate-Palmolive Co., 380 U.S. 374 (1965)". Justia Law.


Stub icon

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.
Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article FTC_v._Colgate-Palmolive_Co., and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.