Happy Here and Now has a 48% on review aggregate site Rotten Tomatoes based on 21 reviews.[3] The critics consensus reads, "Happy Here and Now has a rich setting and some interesting ideas, but the story frustratingly refuses to spark to life."[3]
IndieWire commented the film is "unsure of its ideas"—which are the questions "How is that someone can go missing with all the means at hand to stay in touch?" and "Given all the means we have to keep in touch with each other, why don’t we go missing more often?"[4] The review conceded, "somehow, in the midst of all of these discontinuities and missed connections, Almereyda, miraculously, answers both of his questions, and shapes a cast of characters worthy of the emotional resolution granted them."[4]
Jason Buchanan of AllMovie gave the film 3 out of 5 stars and described it as "an obscure and disturbing study in the nature of avatars in the age of technological isolation."[2]
Jeremiah Kipp of Slant Magazine reviewed the film positively, writing "What might seem like a cold and remote, entirely theoretical, and abstract intellectual exercise is given fresh life, even poetry, by the cityscape in which the tale is set: New Orleans. Almereyda made the film in 2001, intending the story to take place five minutes from now—but instead it feels like some kind of elegy for a ghost city, adding deeper resonance to the story of Muriel, whom it is suggested disappeared into the Internet itself. What once was present no longer exists, and yet there remains an indescribable resonance."[5]
Accolades
Happy Here and Now won the special jury award for narrative feature at SXSW in 2003.[6] It received a nomination for the Producers Award at the 2004 Independent Spirit Awards.[7]
