History_of_ACORN_in_the_United_States

History of ACORN in the United States

History of ACORN in the United States

Former advocacy group

Main article: Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now

The Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) is an international collection of autonomous community-based organizations that advocated for low- and moderate-income families by working. The association was founded in 1970 by Wade Rathke and Gary Delgado,[3] and, at its peak in the US, had over 500,000 members and more than 1,200 neighborhood chapters in over 100 cities.[4][5]

Quick Facts Abbreviation, Formation ...

In the U.S., ACORN suffered a damaging nationwide controversy in the fall of 2009 after James O'Keefe and Hannah Giles secretly recorded, and released videos of interactions with low-level ACORN personnel in several of their offices. In the videos, James poses as a pimp attempting to start a brothel with underage immigrant girls from Central America. ACORN personnel attempt to help James with housing his brothel. Multiple investigations were conducted and found that the released tapes were selectively edited to portray ACORN as negatively as possible, and found James O'Keefe's recordings violated privacy laws in Maryland and California.[6] The organization conducted its own audits and cooperated with investigations of employees, referring some cases to law enforcement. Not one of the cases were forward to a judge. In the meantime, however, the organization suffered an immediate loss of funding from government agencies with which it had contracts and from private donors.[7][8][9]

The loss of funds had been too damaging, and by March 2010, 15 of ACORN's 30 state chapters had already closed.[7] ACORN announced it was closing its remaining state chapters and disbanding.[10] On November 2, 2010, its U.S. offices filed for Chapter 7 liquidation effectively closing the organization.[11] ACORN members and organizers formed new organizations in at least three states[12][13][7] while ACORN groups outside of the US continued unaffected. ACORN, under ACORN International, still works within the US through its Home Savers Campaign, for example.[14]

Organization and budget

In the US, ACORN was composed of a number of legally distinct nonprofit entities and affiliates including a nationwide umbrella organization established as a 501(c)(4) that performed lobbying; local chapters established as 501(c)(3) nonpartisan charities; and the national nonprofit and nonstock organization, ACORN Housing Corporation. ACORN's priorities included: better housing and wages for the poor, more community development investment from banks and governments, better public schools, labor-oriented causes and social justice issues. ACORN pursued these goals through demonstration, negotiation, lobbying for legislation, and voter participation.[15]

Until the controversies of 2008 and 2009, in the US ACORN had an annual budget of approximately US$25 million, with approximately 10% of those funds coming from federal sources, a smaller figure from state sources, and the rest coming from supporters and membership. HUD estimated that ACORN received $42 million in federal funds since the 2000 budget year; the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee estimated that ACORN received $53 million since 1994.[2]

History

1970–1975

ACORN was founded by Wade Rathke, Gary Delgado, and George Wiley in 1970.[3][16] Rathke had previously dropped out of Williams College to promote draft resistance for Students for a Democratic Society. ACORN's first campaign was to help welfare recipients attain their basic needs, such as clothing and furniture. This drive, inspired by a clause in the Arkansas welfare laws, began their effort to create and sustain a movement to assist welfare and lower-income working individuals; they developed the Arkansas Community Organizations for Reform Now, the beginnings of ACORN.[16]

ACORN's goal was to "unite welfare recipients with needy working people around issues such as school lunches, unemployment, Vietnam veterans' rights, and emergency room care."[17]

1975–1980

In 1975, ACORN created branches in Texas and South Dakota. On December 13, 1975, sixty leaders from the three ACORN states elected the first associate Executive Board and the first ACORN president, Steve McDonald, to deal with matters beyond the scope of the individual city and state boards. Each year thereafter ACORN chapters were established in three or more states, building to a total of 20 states represented by 1980. This expansion led to multi-state campaigns, beginning with a mass meeting of 1,000 members in Memphis in 1978. At the end of the conference, ACORN convention delegates marched on the Democratic Party conference with the outline of a nine-point "People's Platform." When ratified in 1979, this became the foundation of ACORN's platform.

ACORN was active in the 1980 Election with the "People's Platform" serving as its standard.[18] It led demonstrations aimed at both major party candidates; demanded to meet with President Jimmy Carter; marched on the president's campaign finance committee chair's home; and presented its platform to the Republican Party platform committee.

1981–1989

By 1980, ACORN's staff was stretched thin by the demands of meeting its expansion goals. Much of its resources and energy had been dedicated to the presidential primaries and national party conventions. ACORN launched squatting campaigns in an attempt to obtain affordable housing, and encouraged squatters to refit the premises for comfortable living.[citation needed]

In June 1982, ACORN sponsored "Reagan Ranches" in Washington, DC and more than 35 other cities, in reaction to its belief that the president was focused on military as opposed to social spending. These tent cities were erected for two days on national park grounds; they were resisted by the National Park Service, which tried repeatedly to evict the tenters. The protesters remained; they marched on the White House and members testified before a Congressional committee about what they described as the housing crisis in America. The last Reagan Ranch was held at the Republican Convention in Dallas in 1984. [citation needed]

In addition to protesting, ACORN also developed and strengthened its political action committees and encouraged its members to run for office. For the 1984 election ACORN wanted to endorse a candidate, setting a 75% support in polls among members as its requirement. No candidate reached that level, though there was strong support for Jesse Jackson. ACORN also established a legislative office that year in Washington, DC. During this period ACORN also focused on local election reform in a number of cities, including Pittsburgh, Columbia, South Carolina, and Sioux Falls, South Dakota. They encouraged cities to change legislative bodies whose members were elected at-large to electing members by single-member district, which resulted in more participation by minorities, including women. At-large voting tends to favor candidates who can appeal to the majority and who can command more campaign funding, reducing participation by a wider variety of citizens.[19]

By the end of Reagan's first term, ACORN operated in 27 states, adding chapters in New York City, Washington, DC, and Chicago.[16] During the 1988 Election, ACORN held its National Convention in the same city as the Democratic Convention — Atlanta.

ACORN's membership grew to more than 70,000 in 28 states during this time. It increased its legislative lobbying efforts in Washington, DC, and strengthened its Political Action Committees (PACs). It also developed what it called the Affiliated Media Foundation Movement (AM/FM). Starting with station KNON in Dallas, AM/FM established radio stations, UHF television and cable television programming. It also sought and received appointments to the Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC), which was formed to dissolve the assets of failed Savings and Loans resulting from the Savings and Loan crisis.[citation needed]

1988–1998

ACORN member demonstrating against predatory lending

While some of ACORN's most notable efforts were in the area of housing, it has counted health, public safety, education, representation, work and workers' rights and communications concerns among its victories. The 1990 ACORN convention in Chicago focused on the fast-breaking housing campaign. It featured a squatting demonstration at an RTC house. ACORN members demanded that banks provide loan data on low- and moderate-income communities and comply with the 1977 Community Reinvestment Act (CRA). ACORN fought weakening of the CRA in 1991, staging a two-day takeover of the House Banking Committee hearing room. It established ACORN Housing Corporation to assist people in moving into homes under the housing campaign, and to rehabilitate hundreds of houses addressed by the CRA.[20] The ACORN convention in New York in 1992, called the "ACORN-Bank Summit", was organized to make deals with giant banks. When Citibank, the nation's largest bank, did not participate, conventioneers protested at its downtown Manhattan headquarters, and won a meeting to negotiate for similar programs. [citation needed]

ACORN supported and lobbied for the "Motor Voter" Act, which provided for voter registration at motor vehicle bureaus. After its passage, ACORN members attended President Clinton's signing ceremony. ACORN worked for new voter registration laws in Arkansas and Massachusetts and filed suit in Illinois, Louisiana, Michigan, Missouri, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania against certain state practices as a result of the act.

In 1993, ACORN also began a national campaign to fight insurance redlining, a practice that put the gains made in other housing campaigns at risk. The campaign targeted Allstate, hitting sales offices in 14 cities and a stockholders meeting. Allstate agreed to negotiate and signed an agreement in 1994 for a $10 million partnership with ACORN and NationsBank for below-market mortgages to low-income home-buyers. Travelers Insurance agreed to a Neighborhood and Home Safety Program, linking access to insurance and lower rates to public safety programs. [citation needed]

1998–2004

ACORN has worked on supporting a "Living Wage" programs, voter registration, and grassroots political organization.[when?]

In 1998, ACORN helped form the Working Families Party in New York, which had made increasing the minimum wage as its centerpiece issue.[citation needed]

A March 27, 2003 decision of the National Labor Relations Board found that ACORN tried to thwart union organizing efforts within its own organization by laying off two workers who were trying to organize.[21] The two workers, both field organizers with ACORN, began discussions with the Service Employees International Union and later sought to organize under Industrial Workers of the World, seeking to improve their $20,200 annual salary for a 54-hour work week.[22] The NLRB ordered the two employees be reinstated in their former jobs and that ACORN cease from interrogating employees about organizing activity.[21]

ACORN International was created in 2004 as an offshoot of ACORN to aid the spread of ACORN's model to other countries.[23]

2008–2009

Accusations of voter fraud

ACORN is a liberal organization, and in the US its legally separate political action arm frequently endorsed causes and candidates, including the 2008 Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama.[5][24][25][26] ACORN lobbied every Democratic National Convention since 1980[27] and had members elected as delegates to those conventions;[27] ACORN also lobbied at Republican conventions.[27] ACORN was criticized by Republicans for its support of Democratic candidates and for its general support of political positions that are more often favored by Democrats.[24]

In a report released in October 2008, the U.S. Department of Justice Inspector General concluded that U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales fired U.S. Attorney David Iglesias (one of nine US attorneys removed in 2006) for political reasons after Iglesias failed to prosecute a New Mexico ACORN chapter. The report said claims that Iglesias was fired for poor performance were not credible, and the "real reason for Iglesias's removal was the complaints from New Mexico Republican politicians and party activists about how Iglesias handled voter fraud [cases]."[28] Iglesias did not believe there was sufficient evidence to support prosecution by the government.

During the debate on the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, some commentators claimed that a draft provision (omitted in the adopted bill) to give money to funds run by the U.S. Department of the Treasury could potentially lead to money going to groups like ACORN.[24][29] When asked how much money ACORN or other community groups would get, a spokesman for Financial Services Committee chairman Barney Frank, said, "Absolutely none. All funds would go to state and local governments."[9] Critics also claimed that ACORN's complex organizational structure allowed it to escape public scrutiny.[30]

ACORN was among groups conducting voter registration drives prior to the 2008 presidential election; it was alleged they were responsible for voter registration fraud and had a conflict of interest. During the 2008 Democratic Presidential Primary, ACORN's national political action committee, ACORN Votes, endorsed Barack Obama.[31] Obama, with several other attorneys, had served as local counsel for ACORN more than a decade earlier in a 1995 voting rights lawsuit joined by the Justice Department and the League of Women Voters.[32][33] Obama's campaign hired an ACORN affiliate for $800,000 to conduct a get-out-the-vote effort during that primary,[34][35] but did not retain ACORN for the general presidential election.[34][35]

Throughout the election season, supporters of Republican candidates alleged that ACORN was responsible for widespread vote fraud. In October 2008, the campaign for Republican presidential candidate John McCain released a Web-based advertisement claiming ACORN was responsible for "massive voter fraud," a point that Sen. McCain repeated in the final presidential debate. FactCheck.org called this claim "breathtakingly inaccurate," but acknowledged that ACORN had problems with phony registrations.[36] The ads also claimed that home loan programs ACORN promoted were partly responsible for the sub-prime mortgage crisis, claims which Newsweek and Factcheck.org also found to be exaggerated and inaccurate.[37]

A poll released in November 2009 by Public Policy Polling found that 26% of respondents overall, believed in a conspiracy theory that ACORN "stole" the election for Barack Obama. That number increased to 56% amongst Republicans polled. The Democratic polling organization commented that this was somewhat higher than belief in the birther conspiracy theories.[38] (In a follow-poll in 2012, PPP found that 49% of Republicans, nearly the same percentage as in 2009, believed that ACORN had stolen the 2012 election for Obama, despite the fact that by then ACORN was no longer operating.[39])

Embezzlement

The New York Times reported on July 9, 2008, that Dale Rathke, the brother of ACORN's founder Wade Rathke, was found to have embezzled $948,607.50 from the group and affiliated charitable organizations in 1999 and 2000.[40] ACORN executives decided to handle it as an internal matter, and did not inform most of the board members or law enforcement, and instead signed an enforceable restitution agreement with the Rathke family to repay the amount of the embezzlement. $210,000 has already been repaid, and a donor, Drummond Pike, has offered to pay the remaining debt.[41] The Times reported that, according to Wade Rathke, "the decision to keep the matter secret was not made to protect his brother but because word of the embezzlement would have put a 'weapon' into the hands of enemies of ACORN, a liberal group that is a frequent target of conservatives who object to ACORN's often strident advocacy on behalf of low- and moderate-income families and workers." A whistleblower revealed the embezzlement in 2008. On June 2, 2008, Dale Rathke was dismissed, and Wade stepped down as ACORN's chief organizer, but he remains chief organizer for Acorn International L.L.C.[40]

In September 2008, following revelations of Dale Rathke's embezzlement, two members of ACORN's national board of directors filed a lawsuit seeking to obtain financial documents and to force the organization to sever ties with Wade Rathke.[42] ACORN's executive committee voted unanimously to remove the two, "because their actions—such as releasing a confidential legal memo to the press—were damaging the organization."[43]

In October 2009, Louisiana Attorney General Buddy Caldwell claimed in a subpoena that ACORN's board of directors found that a larger amount—$5 million—had been embezzled from the organization. Bertha Lewis, ACORN's CEO, said the allegation is false.[44] On November 6, following up on the subpoena, Caldwell served a search warrant at the ACORN headquarters in New Orleans.[45] Caldwell stated, "This is an investigation of everything—Acorn, the national organization, the local organization and all of its affiliated entities."[46]

Undercover videos controversy

Main article: ACORN 2009 undercover videos controversy

In September 2009, Hannah Giles and James O'Keefe publicized [47][48][49] hidden camera recordings through Fox News and Andrew Breitbart's website BigGovernment.[6] In the videos, Giles posed as a prostitute and O'Keefe posed as her boyfriend in order to elicit damaging responses from employees of ACORN.[6] The videos were recorded over the summer of 2009 while visiting ACORN offices in eight cities,[50] and purported to show low-level ACORN employees in several cities providing advice to Giles and O'Keefe on how to avoid taxes and detection by the authorities with regard to their plans to engage in tax evasion, human smuggling, and child prostitution.[51]

After the videos were made public, the U.S. Congress voted to eliminate federal funding to ACORN. The House passed a bill by a 345–75 vote to stop all federal funding to ACORN. Every House Republican who attended the vote backed the measure, as well as 172 Democrats, while only 75 Democrats opposed it. The Senate, earlier had passed a bill by an 83 to 7 margin to bar ACORN from receiving federal housing grants from the Department of Housing and Urban Development.[52]

Although the resolutions were later nullified in a federal court ruling that the measure was an unconstitutional bill of attainder, on August 13, 2010, a federal appeals court upheld the congressional act that cut off federal funding for ACORN.[53][54][55][56] In March 2010, ACORN announced it would be closing its offices and disbanding due to loss of funding from government and private donors.[57]

On December 7, 2009, the former Massachusetts Attorney General, after an independent internal investigation of ACORN, found the videos that had been released appeared to have been edited, "in some cases substantially". He found no evidence of criminal conduct by ACORN employees, but concluded that ACORN had poor management practices that contributed to unprofessional actions by a number of its low-level employees.[58][59][60][61] On March 1, 2010, the District Attorney's office for Brooklyn determined that the videos were "heavily edited" and "many of the seemingly crime-encouraging answers were taken out of context so as to appear more sinister",[62] and concluded that there was no criminal wrongdoing by the ACORN staff in the videos from the Brooklyn ACORN office.[63][64] On April 1, 2010, an investigation by the California Attorney General found the videos from Los Angeles, San Diego and San Bernardino to be "heavily edited,"[6] and the investigation did not find evidence of criminal conduct on the part of ACORN employees.[6][49] On June 14, 2010, the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) released its findings which showed that ACORN evidenced no sign that it, or any of its related organizations, mishandled any federal money they had received.[65][66]

Defund ACORN Act

In late 2009, after various allegations of criminal activity due to the videos, a number of Democrats who once advertised their connections to ACORN began to distance themselves.[67] In immediate response to the 2009 video controversy, the United States House and Senate, by wide margins, attached amendments to pending spending legislation that would temporarily prohibit the federal government from funding ACORN, or any agency that had been involved in similar scandals — including money authorized by previous legislation. President Obama signed the bill into law on October 1.[68]

ACORN sued the United States Government in the United States District Court in Brooklyn over the measure, known as the "Defund ACORN Act", claiming it was a bill of attainder, and therefore unconstitutional. Experts varied on the merit of the case, which was styled ACORN v. United States. One argument was that while government funding choices do not generally qualify as bills of attainder, the lack of a non-punitive regulatory purpose for the legislation may give a court "sufficient basis to overcome the presumption of constitutionality."[69][70][71] The court issued a preliminary injunction that nullified the act.[53]

In response to an inquiry from a Housing and Urban Development Department lawyer, David Barron, the acting assistant attorney general for the Office of Legal Counsel, wrote a five-page memorandum concluding that the law does not prohibit the government from paying ACORN for services already performed.[68] On December 11, U.S. District Judge Nina Gershon issued a preliminary injunction blocking the government from enforcing its temporary spending ban, a week before it was set to expire.[72] The Government Accountability Office (GAO) opened an investigation of ACORN in December 2009.[73] In June 2010, the GAO released a preliminary report stating the investigation has found no sign the group or related organizations mishandled the $40 million in federal money they received from nine federal agencies.[74]

On August 13, 2010 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed Judge Gershon's decision.[75] The appeals court cited a study finding that only 10% of ACORN's funding came from federal sources, and stated, "We doubt that the direct consequences of the appropriations laws temporarily precluding ACORN from federal funds were so disproportionately severe or so inappropriate as to constitute punishment."[75] The Center for Constitutional Rights, which had argued the case on ACORN's behalf, was considering a request for a rehearing by more judges of the 2nd Circuit.[75]

Dissolution

On March 19, 2010, The New York Times reported that ACORN was on the verge of filing for bankruptcy; 15 of the group's 30 state chapters had disbanded over the previous six months, and other chapters (including the largest, in New York and California) renamed themselves and severed all ties to the national organization.[7] Two unnamed ACORN officials told the Times that the following weekend, a teleconference was planned to discuss a bankruptcy filing; "private donations from foundations to Acorn [had] all but evaporated," and the federal government had distanced itself from the group.[7] "[L]ong before the activist videos delivered what may become the final blow, the organization was dogged for years by financial problems and accusations of fraud."[7] "That 20-minute video ruined 40 years of good work," said Sonja Merchant-Jones, former co-chairwoman of ACORN's recently closed Maryland chapter. "But if the organization had confronted its own internal problems, it might not have been taken down so easily."[7]

On March 22, 2010, National ACORN spokesman Kevin Whelan says the organization's board decided to close remaining state affiliates and field offices by April 1 because of falling revenues.[76] Other national operations continued operating for another several weeks before shutting for good.[73] On April 20, ACORN CEO Bertha Lewis reported that ACORN was "still alive. We're limping along. We're on life support."[77] Lewis said that ACORN's annual budget had been reduced from $25 million to $4 million, and that its staff of 350 to 600 people had been reduced to four.[77] Lewis explained the controversies had left a stain on ACORN, "sort of like a scarlet letter," forcing the group to spend money defending itself against "one investigation after another."[77]

ACORN-affiliated groups

After the dissolution of ACORN in the US, some chapters continued operations by setting up new organization:

  • Members and staff of California ACORN founded a new organization, the Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment.[12]
  • New York ACORN founded New York Communities for Change.[7]
  • A Milwaukee offshoot of ACORN called Acorn Housing changed its name to Affordable Housing Centers of America[13] yet has retained the same tax and employee identification numbers that it held under its former name.[78]
  • The Center for Popular Democracy includes many of the old chapters of ACORN.[79]

After ACORN International was founded, groups in other countries became affiliated, include Living Rent in Scotland[80] and Alliance Citoyenne in France.[81]

References

  1. [1]
    Rutenberg, Jim (October 7, 2009). "Acorn Chief Denounces Air of 'McCarthyism'". The Politics and Government Blog of the Times. The New York Times. Retrieved October 7, 2009.
  2. [2]
    "Did ACORN get too big for its own good?". NBC News. September 19, 2009.
  3. [3]
    Walls, David (Summer 1994). "Power to the People: Thirty-five Years of Community Organizing". The Workbook. Archived from the original on November 15, 2010. Retrieved December 3, 2010.
  4. [4]
    Michael B. Farrell (September 16, 2009). "What is the ACORN controversy about?". Christian Science Monitor.
  5. [5]
    "Who is ACORN? (organization homepage)". Archived from the original on December 31, 2012. Retrieved September 15, 2009.
  6. [6]
    "Report of the Attorney General on the activities of ACORN" (PDF). April 1, 2010. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 12, 2011. Retrieved May 19, 2010.
  7. [7]
    Urbina, Ian (March 19, 2010). "Acorn on Brink of Bankruptcy, Officials Say". The New York Times. Archived from the original on March 23, 2010. Retrieved March 20, 2010.
  8. [8]
    "Second Video Shows ACORN Officials Helping 'Pimp,' 'Prostitute' in Washington Office". Fox News. September 11, 2009. Archived from the original on September 13, 2009. Retrieved September 11, 2009.
  9. [9]
    Ryan Grim (September 27, 2008). "ACORN Issue Fueling Bailout Opposition". CBS News.
  10. [10]
    "ACORN Closing in Wake of Scandal". FOX News. March 22, 2010. Archived from the original on March 25, 2010. Retrieved March 22, 2010.
  11. [11]
    ACORN filing for Chapter 7 bankruptcy; Los Angeles Times; November 2, 2010
  12. [12]
    "January 13th Statement" (Press release). Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment. January 13, 2010. Archived from the original on April 14, 2013. Retrieved May 12, 2011. The leadership and staff that were working with ACORN in California made the decision to break off from ACORN and launch a new organization here in California called Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment (ACCE).
  13. [13]
    "Milwaukee chosen to pilot program aimed at foreclosures". Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. June 28, 2010. Retrieved May 12, 2011.
  14. [14]
    Akers, Joshua; Seymour, Eric; Butler, Diné; Rathke, Wade (April 4, 2019). "Liquid Tenancy: 'Post-crisis' economies of displacement, community organizing, and new forms of resistance". Radical Housing Journal. 1 (1): 9–28. doi:10.54825/JGJT2051.
  15. [15]
    "New Report Finds Widespread Local Use of Affordable Housing Program Being Currently Debated in Congress". ACORN (press release). July 23, 2002. Archived from the original on September 27, 2011. Retrieved March 19, 2020.
  16. [16]
    Delgado, Gary (1986). Organizing the Movement: The Roots and Growth of ACORN. Temple University Press. ISBN 0-87722-393-9. OCLC 12134922.
  17. [17]
    ACORN History Archived March 27, 2012, at the Wayback Machine acorn.org
  18. [18]
    "Western Historical Manuscript Collection". University of Missouri – St. Louis. June 1980. Archived from the original on September 29, 2007. Retrieved November 12, 2007.
  19. [19]
    Archived September 6, 2008, at the Wayback Machine
  20. [20]
    ACORN affiliates rebrand after video scandal; NBC News; March 15, 2010
  21. [21]
    "Decisions of the NLRB, 338–129" (PDF). National Labor Relations Board. March 27, 2003. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 29, 2007. Retrieved October 12, 2006.
  22. [22]
    Willamette Week | "The ACORN that imploded"|March 6th, 2002 Archived 2008-10-16 at the Wayback Machine.
  23. [23]
    D. Beck and R. Purcell, International community organising (Bristol: Policy Press, 2013)
  24. [24]
    Williamson, Elizabeth; Mullins, Brody (July 31, 2008). "Democratic Ally Mobilizes In Housing Crunch". The Wall Street Journal.
  25. [25]
    Katrina vanden Heuvel (February 23, 2008). "ACORN: Obama Gets It". The Nation.
  26. [26]
    "ACORN's Political Action Committee Endorses Obama" (Press release). ACORN. Archived from the original on June 16, 2011. Retrieved December 3, 2010.
  27. [27]
    "Detailed History of ACORN: The ACORN 80 Plan". ACORN. Archived from the original on December 5, 2010. Retrieved December 3, 2010.
  28. [28]
    U.S. Department of Justice Inspector General. "An Investigation into the Removal of Nine U.S. Attorneys in 2006, pp. 156–167, 190" (PDF).
  29. [29]
    "Draft bill". U.S. House of Representatives. Archived from the original on November 8, 2010. Retrieved December 3, 2010.
  30. [30]
    Peter Overby. "ACORN Has Long Been In Republicans' Cross Hairs". NPR. Archived from the original on December 5, 2010. Retrieved December 3, 2010.
  31. [31]
    Henig, Jess (October 18, 2008). "ACORN Accusations". FactCheck.org. Retrieved May 31, 2019.
  32. [32]
    Stephanie Strom (October 8, 2008). "On Obama, Acorn and Voter Registration". The New York Times.
  33. [33]
    Barabak, Mark Z.; Seema Mehta (October 16, 2008). "McCain, Obama duel in caustic debate finale". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on October 19, 2008. Retrieved October 17, 2008.
  34. [34]
    David M. Brown (August 22, 2008). "Obama to amend report on $800,000 in spending". Pittsburgh Tribune Review. Archived from the original on October 12, 2008.
  35. [35]
    Bill Draper (October 8, 2008). "Missouri officials suspect fake voter registration". Associated Press.[dead link]
  36. [36]
    Novak, Viveca (October 31, 2008). "The Whoppers of 2008 – The Sequel". factcheck.org. Archived from the original on January 22, 2009. Retrieved January 23, 2009.
  37. [37]
    Jess Henig (October 18, 2008). "ACORN Accusations". Newsweek. Archived from the original on August 14, 2009.
  38. [38]
    "Public Policy Polling: ACORN". Publicpolicypolling.blogspot.com. November 19, 2009. Retrieved May 12, 2011.
  39. [39]
    Jensen, Tom (December 4, 2012), Republicans not handling election results well, Public Policy Polling, retrieved December 21, 2013
  40. [40]
    Strom, Stephanie (July 9, 2008). "Funds Misappropriated at 2 Nonprofit Groups". The New York Times. Archived from the original on July 9, 2011. Retrieved October 13, 2008.
  41. [41]
    Strom, Stephanie (August 17, 2008). "Head of Foundation Bailed Out Nonprofit Group After Its Funds Were Embezzled". The New York Times.
  42. [42]
    Strom, Stephanie (September 12, 2008). "Lawsuit Adds to Turmoil for Community Group". The New York Times. Retrieved May 12, 2011.
  43. [43]
    "Ousted ACORN members seek federal criminal investigation – Pittsburgh Tribune-Review". Pittsburghlive.com. January 8, 2009. Archived from the original on March 29, 2012. Retrieved May 12, 2011.
  44. [44]
    "La. prosecutor probes ACORN after $5 million embezzlement". StAugustine.com. October 7, 2009. Retrieved May 12, 2011.
  45. [45]
    Carr, Martha (November 6, 2009). "State investigators taking dozens of computers from ACORN office on Canal Street". New Orleans Times-Picayune. Archived from the original on November 9, 2009. Retrieved November 6, 2009.
  46. [46]
    "Acorn offices in New Orleans Are Raided". The New York Times. November 6, 2009. Archived from the original on July 10, 2011. Retrieved November 10, 2009.
  47. [47]
    California AG Determines ACORN Broke No Criminal Laws Archived November 12, 2010, at the Wayback Machine FOX News; April 1, 2010
  48. [48]
    Fake pimp from ACORN videos tries to 'punk' CNN correspondent CNN; September 29, 2009
  49. [49]
    "Brown Releases Report Detailing a Litany of Problems with ACORN, But No Criminality". California Office of Attorney General. April 1, 2010. Archived from the original on April 3, 2010. Retrieved April 3, 2010.
  50. [50]
    According to the California Attorney General's investigation report, page 8, the recordings occurred in ACORN offices in eight cities: Philadelphia, Baltimore, Washington, D.C., Brooklyn, Miami, Los Angeles, San Diego, and San Bernardino.
  51. [51]
    Shane, Scott (September 19, 2009). "A Political Gadfly Lampoons the Left via YouTube". The New York Times. Retrieved September 26, 2009.
  52. [52]
    Bacon Jr., Perry (September 19, 2009). "House Votes to End Federal Funding for ACORN". The Washington Post. Retrieved September 17, 2009.
  53. [53]
    Lorber, Janie (December 11, 2009). "House Ban on Acorn Grants Is Ruled Unconstitutional". The New York Times. p. A12. Retrieved February 1, 2010.
  54. [54]
    Taylor, Andrew (September 14, 2009). "Senate votes to deny funds to ACORN". Associated Press. Archived from the original on September 23, 2009. Retrieved September 15, 2009.
  55. [55]
    "House Votes to Strip Funding for ACORN". Fox News. September 17, 2009. Archived from the original on September 22, 2009. Retrieved September 17, 2009.
  56. [56]
    Hays, Tom. Federal appeals court in NY rules against ACORN. Associated Press, August 13, 2010.
  57. [57]
    "ACORN disbanding because of money woes, scandal". Associated Press.[permanent dead link]
  58. [58]
    Scott Harshbarger and Amy Crafts (December 7, 2009). An Independent Governance Assessment of ACORN: The Path To Meaningful Reform (PDF) (Report). Proskauer. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 8, 2010. Retrieved October 12, 2010.
  59. [59]
    James, Frank (December 7, 2009). "ACORN Workers Cleared Of Illegality By Outside Probe". Npr.org. Archived from the original on May 11, 2011. Retrieved May 12, 2011.
  60. [60]
    ACORN and the Ethics of Leadership, Atlantic Monthly, Dec. 8, 2009
  61. [61]
    ACORN Investigation Results Archived December 13, 2009, at the Wayback Machine, The Nonprofit Quarterly
  62. [62]
    Damaging Brooklyn ACORN Sting Video Ruled 'Heavily Edited,' No Charges to Be Filed New York Magazine; March 2, 2010
  63. [63]
    Newman, Andrew (March 1, 2010). "Advice to Fake Pimp Was No Crime, Prosecutor Says". The New York Times. Archived from the original on March 25, 2010. Retrieved March 7, 2010.
  64. [64]
    Madde, Mike (March 1, 2010). "Brooklyn prosecutors clear local ACORN office". Salon.com. Archived from the original on March 7, 2010. Retrieved March 7, 2010.
  65. [65]
    ACORN Vindicated of Wrongdoing by the Congressional Watchdog Office Huffington Post; June 15, 2010; John Atlas
  66. [66]
    "Preliminary report clears ACORN on funds". CNN. June 15, 2010.
  67. [67]
    Sharon Theimer and Pete Yost (September 19, 2009). "Did ACORN get too big for its own good?". NBC News. Associated Press.
  68. [68]
    Charlie Savage (November 27, 2009). "Justice Department Says Acorn Can Be Paid for Pre-Ban Contracts". The New York Times. Archived from the original on July 14, 2011. Retrieved December 3, 2009.
  69. [69]
    Kareem Fahim (November 12, 2009). "Acorn Sues Over Funding Vote in House". The New York Times. Retrieved November 13, 2009.
  70. [70]
    Kenneth R. Thomas. "The proposed "Defund ACORN Act": Is it a "Bill of Attainder?"" (PDF). Congressional Research Service. Archived (PDF) from the original on November 4, 2009. Retrieved November 14, 2009.
  71. [71]
    Hans von Spokavsky (September 27, 2009). "Defunding ACORN: Necessary and Proper, and Certainly Constitutional". The Heritage Foundation. Archived from the original on November 12, 2009. Retrieved November 13, 2009.
  72. [72]
    Merchant, Nomaan (December 12, 2009). "Judge Blocks U.S. Ban on Funding for Acorn". Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on December 15, 2009. Retrieved December 12, 2009.
  73. [73]
    Jake Sherman (December 17, 2009). "GAO Opens ACORN Investigation". Politico.com. Retrieved December 17, 2009.
  74. [74]
    Preliminary report clears ACORN on funds, CNN; June 14, 2010
  75. [75]
    Hays, Tom. "Federal appeals court in NY rules against ACORN". Associated Press (via KTUU-TV Alaska), August 13, 2010. Archived August 15, 2010, at the Wayback Machine
  76. [76]
    Smith, Ben (March 22, 2010). "ACORN Folds". Politico.com. Archived from the original on March 25, 2010. Retrieved March 22, 2010.
  77. [77]
    Larry Neumeister (April 20, 2010). "ACORN CEO outside court: 'We're on life support'". Associated Press. Archived from the original on April 25, 2010.
  78. [78]
    "An ACORN by Any Other Name Still Smells Like an ACORN Critics Say". Foxnews.com. April 7, 2010. Retrieved May 12, 2011.
  79. [79]
    Judis, John (June 20, 2015). "Dear Democrats: Populism Will Not Save You". National Journal. Retrieved July 30, 2015.
  80. [80]
    P. Smythe, 'Housing will be the basis for all change in our country': an interview with Living Rent' (29/04/20) in The Student
  81. [81]
    J. Talpin, 'The Americanization of French social movements? Community organizing and its discontents in the banlieues' (29/06/17) on metropolitics.org

Bibliography

ACORN International's US campaigns

Legacy websites
Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article History_of_ACORN_in_the_United_States, and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.