The News Media Bargaining Code (NMBC, or News Media and Digital Platforms Mandatory Bargaining Code)^[1] is a law designed to have large technology platforms that operate in Australia pay local news publishers for the news content made available or linked on their platforms. The law's definition of news is broad,^[2] including "content that reports, investigates or explains ... current issues or events of public significance for Australians at a local, regional or national level."^[3]: 3 Originating in April 2020, when the Australian Government asked the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission (ACCC) to begin drafting it, it achieved broad support in the Australian Parliament but staunch opposition from Facebook and Google.^[4][5] In response, on 18 February 2021, Facebook blocked Australian users from sharing or viewing news content on its platform.^[6] The Australian government strongly criticised the move, saying it demonstrated the "immense market power of these digital social giants".^[7] A few days later, Australia and Facebook came to an agreement on restoring news pages.^[8]

The bill seeks to "address a bargaining power imbalance that exists between digital platforms and Australian news businesses" which the ACCC identified in its Digital Platforms Inquiry report.^[9] The Australian government hopes it "will ensure that news media businesses are fairly remunerated for the content they generate, helping to sustain public interest journalism in Australia".^[10]

It would require stakeholders to agree to a dollar value of the news content distributed by the platforms, pay that revenue to registered news publishers, and agree to final offer arbitration in the case of a dispute between a publisher and a platform on the value of the news content.^[9] The bill defined making "content available" by "if the content is reproduced on the service, or is otherwise placed on the service, or if a link to the content or an extract of the content is provided on the service."^[9] Nine Network estimated this amount to be $432 million.^[11] The code would also require digital platforms give 28 days notice to Australian news publishers about algorithm changes that could affect links to their news content.^[12]

Proponents of the law argue that the profitability of social media companies is partly attributable to the fact that users can receive news updates even when they do not view the ads on the page of the original publisher.

The code was supported by media companies based outside Australia The Guardian, the Daily Mail,^[13] and News Corp. The bill was also supported by the Australian Press Council.^[9] The bill also saw support from public broadcasters, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation and the Special Broadcasting Service, following their amended inclusion in the remuneration stages of the code.^[14][15] The bill also saw support from Microsoft, which issued a statement suggesting that the code would be made to work with its search engine Bing.^[16] This followed a comment from Google Australia which said the company would pull out of the Australian market if the code was enacted.^[17]

Smaller journalistic entities including The New Daily, Crikey and Country Press Australia argued that the code favours dominant media companies at the expense of smaller publishers.^[9]

Google criticised the idea as unfeasible, especially the restrictions on when they can change the algorithms for how various sources are ranked.^[4] The policy director of the Australian Taxpayers' Alliance called the measure protectionism.^[4] Other notable technologists including World Wide Web inventor Tim Berners-Lee,^[18] journalism professor Jeff Jarvis,^[19] New York Times technology journalist Kara Swisher^[20] and Stratechery writer Ben Thompson^[21] criticised the code for being technically unworkable. Former Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, who is a prominent activist against News Corp,^[22] argued that the code was designed to favour the company's properties.^[23] Crikey political editor Bernard Keane criticised Australian mainstream media for allegedly "systematically misleading [their] audiences" over the code and the legislation.^[24]

In December 2017, the Turnbull government directed the ACCC to conduct an inquiry into "competition in media and advertising services markets", focusing in large part on Google and Facebook. The final report published in July 2019 made several conclusions regarding the state of competition in the news and media landscape:^[25]

[We're seeing] reduced production of particular types of news and journalism, including local government and local court reporting, which are important for the healthy functioning of the democratic process. There is not yet any indication of a business model that can effectively replace the advertiser model, which has historically funded the production of these types of journalism in Australia.

In April 2020, the Morrison government directed the ACCC to develop a mandatory code "to address bargaining power imbalances between digital platforms and media companies". The draft News Media Bargaining Code was published by the ACCC in July 2020, and interested parties were invited to make submissions regarding the proposed code.^[5]

In August 2020, Google users in Australia were directed to an open letter protesting the law, which the ACCC characterised as misleading. The letter stated that Google already complies with existing reimbursement programs that are less broad.^[11] While in submission phase in Parliament, Google Australia director Mel Silva said the bill was "untenable" and that the company would discontinue access to its search engine within Australia if the code was enacted without changes.^[26]

On 28 August 2020, the ACCC closed the consultation period on the proposal. The code was converted to a bill and sent to Parliament in December 2020.^[5]

The bill caused digital platforms to negotiate payments to local news publishers. By February 2021, Google established deals in anticipation of the code's enactment and negotiated lump sum deals with Seven West Media,^[27] Nine Entertainment,^[28] and News Corp^[29] to provide content for the company's new "News Showcase" feature. These deals would mean Google can avoid entering the arbitration stages of the code.^[30]

The evaluation of the NMBC implementation is hampered by its "murky" nature, "with critical details guarded like they're nuclear launch codes". Still, by 2023 it was considered a success by the journalism researchers and the Australian government.^[48] Media outlets had expanded their newsrooms.^[49]

More than 30 deals have been reached after the first year of operation,^[50] with the number of media companies much higher: NMBC allows collective bargaining for the companies with revenues below 10 million Australian dollars; one of the agreements involved 84 smaller companies, another 24. The total value of the deals was 200 million Australian dollars.^[49] Notable failures include the inability of the Special Broadcasting Service and The Conversation to reach an agreement with Facebook. The Australian Department of Treasury was considering extending the NMBC to Instagram and TikTok^[50] (YouTube is sharing its revenues already^[49]).

• Copyright aspects of hyperlinking and framing
• Disruptive innovation
• History of fair use proposals in Australia
• Internet neutrality
• Mass media in Australia
• Online News Act, similar legislation in Canada