Pano_languages

Panoan languages

Panoan languages

Family of languages spoken in Peru, western Brazil, and Bolivia


Panoan (also Pánoan, Panoano, Panoana, Páno) is a family of languages spoken in western Brazil, eastern Peru, and northern Bolivia. It is possibly a branch of a larger Pano–Tacanan family.

Quick Facts Geographic distribution, Linguistic classification ...

Genetic relations

The Panoan family is generally believed to be related to the Tacanan family, forming with it Pano–Tacanan, though this has not yet been established (Loos 1999).

Language contact

Jolkesky (2016) notes that there are lexical similarities with the Kechua, Mapudungun, Moseten-Tsimane, Tukano, Uru-Chipaya, Harakmbet, Arawak, Kandoshi, and Pukina language families due to contact.[1]

Languages

There are some 18 extant and 14 extinct Panoan languages.[2] In the list of Panoan languages below adapted from Fleck (2013), () means extinct, and (*) obsolescent (no longer spoken daily). Dialects are listed in parentheses.

Boundaries between the Poyanawa, Chama, and Headwaters groups are somewhat blurred. Karipuna and Môa River Nawa may not be distinct languages, and Chiriba may not be Panoan at all.

Hundreds of other Panoan "languages" have been reported in the literature. These are names of groups that may have been ethnically Panoan, but whose language is unattested. They sometimes are assumed to be Panoan on no other evidence than that the name ends in -nawa or -bo. A few, such as Maya (Pisabo), are unattested but reported to be mutually intelligible with a known Panoan language (in this case Matsés).[citation needed] The people speaking one of these supposed languages, Kontanáwa,[3] was rediscovered in 2002. However, no linguistic information is available, and it is not known if they speak a distinct language.[4]

Amarante Ribeiro (2005)

Classification of the Panoan languages according to Amarante Ribeiro (2005):[5]

Oliveira (2014)

Internal classification by Oliveira (2014: 123):[6]

  • Panoan
    • Group 1: Kashíbo
    • Group 2
      • Shípibo-Kónibo, Kapanáwa
      • Marúbo (?)
    • Group 3: Chákobo, Kaxararí (?)
    • Group 4: Yamináwa, Chanináwa, Sharanáwa
    • Group 5: Shanenáwa, Katukína
    • Group 6: Poyanáwa (?), Amawáka
    • Group 7
      • Kaxinawá, Marináwa
      • Yawanawá
    • Group 8: Mayorúna, Matís, Korúbo

Jolkesky (2016)

Internal classification by Jolkesky (2016):[1]

( = extinct)

Homonyms

Much of the confusion surrounding Panoan languages is the number of homonyms among different languages. The principal ambiguous names are as follows:[2]

More information Name, Location or other name ...

Neighboring languages of other families may also share the names of Panoan language. The table below ignores other homonyms further afield:

More information Family, Language ...

Varieties

Below is a full list of Panoan language varieties listed by Loukotka (1968), including names of unattested varieties.[7]

Northern languages
  • Pano / Pánobo - spoken in the village of Contamana on the Ucayali River, Loreto province, Peru.
  • Maruba / Maxuruna / Mayoruna / Pelado / Dallus - spoken on the Maruba River and Jandiatuba River, state of Amazonas.
  • Culino - extinct language once spoken between the Jutaí River, Javarí River, and Jandiatuba River, Amazonas.
  • Panau - spoken by only a few families in Seringal Barão, Rio Branco, territory of Acre, Brazil. (Unattested.)
  • Cashibo / Cacataibo / Caxivo / Hagueti - spoken on the Pachitea River, Pisqui River, and Aguaytía River, Loreto, Peru.
  • Manamabobo - extinct language once spoken on the Pachitea River, Peru. (Unattested.)
  • Carapacho / Caliseca - once spoken on the Carapacho River, Peru. (Unattested.)
  • Pichobo - once spoken at the mouth of the Paguamigua River in Peru. (Unattested.)
  • Sobolbo / Bolbo - once spoken on the Cohengua River, Peru. (Unattested.)
  • Mochobo - once spoken between the Guanie River and Guarimi River. (Unattested.)
  • Maspo - once spoken on the Taco River and Manipaboro River. (Unattested.)
  • Comobo / Univitsa - once spoken in the same region on the Inua River and Unini River. (Unattested.)
  • Conibo / Cunibo / Curibeo - spoken along the Ucayali River between 8° 30' and 10° latitude.
  • Cháma / Manava / Chipeo / Setebo / Shipibo / Puinahva - spoken on the Ucayali River north of the Conibo tribe.
  • Nocamán - spoken at the sources of the Chesco River, Loreto.
  • Ruanagua - spoken on the Corjuania River, Loreto. (Unattested.)
  • Capanagua - spoken on the Tapiche River and Blanco River, Loreto.
  • Busquipani - once spoken on the Alacrán River, Loreto. (Unattested.)
  • Custanáwa - spoken on the upper course of the Purus River near the mouth of the Curanja River, Loreto. (Unattested.)
  • Espino - spoken on the Curumaha River in the same region. (Unattested.)
  • Yura - once spoken on the Piqueyaco River, Loreto. (Unattested.)
  • Marináwa - spoken on the Furnaya River, Loreto. (Pike and Scott 1962.)
  • Xaranáwa - spoken on the Curanja River, Loreto. (Unattested.)
  • Canawari - extinct language once spoken on the Curumaha River and Rixalá River, Acre territory, Brazil
  • Nucuini / Remo / Rheno - spoken at the sources of the Javari River and on the Moenalco River[further explanation needed] and Ipixuna River, state of Amazonas.
  • Amahuaca / Sayaco / Impetineri - spoken on the Urubamba River and Ucayali River, Loreto, and on the Purus River and Juruá River, Acre.
  • Mastináhua - spoken on the Purus River in the same territory. (Unattested.)
  • Cachináua / Huñikui - spoken between the Embira River, Liberdade River, and Tarauacá River, state of Amazonas.
  • Tuxináua - spoken on the Embira River and Humaitá River, Acre.
  • Camanáwa - on the Môa River in Acre. (Unattested.)
  • Pacanáwa - spoken at the sources of the Embira River, Acre. (Unattested.)
  • Nehanáwa - spoken by a small tribe on the Jordão River, Acre.
  • Nastanáwa - spoken on the upper course of the Jordão River.
  • Cuyanáwa - spoken between the Môa River and Paraná dos Mouros River, Acre territory. (Unattested.)
  • Sacuya - once spoken between the Juruá River and Tamaya River, Acre. (Unattested.)
  • Xanindáua - spoken by a small tribe on the Riozinho River, Acre. (Unattested.)
  • Coronáwa - spoken in the Acre territory, but exact location unknown. (Unattested.)
  • Yauavo - once spoken between the Tejo River and Aturia River, Acre. (Unattested.)
Yaminaua group
Sensi group
Central group
  • Yamiaca / Haauñeiri - spoken by a small tribe on the Yaguarmayo River, department of Madre de Dios, Peru.
  • Arazaire - language spoken by a few families in the same region on the Marcapata River.
  • Atsahuaca / Chaspa - spoken on the Carama River in Peru.
  • Araua - extinct language once spoken on the Chiva River, territory of Colonia, Bolivia. (Unattested.)
Eastern group
  • Chacobo - spoken around Lake Rogoaguado, Beni province, Bolivia.
  • Capuibo - once spoken on the Biata River in Beni province, Bolivia. (Unattested.)
  • Pacaguara - language now probably extinct, once spoken between the Beni River and Abuña River.
  • Sinabo / Shenabu / Gritones - language now probably extinct, once spoken on the Mamoré River near Los Almendrales, Beni Province. (Unattested.)
  • Caripuna / Jaunavô / Shakáre / Éloe / Yacariá - spoken in the nineteenth century along the Madeira River and the sources of the Beni River, now only in a single village at the mouth of the Mutumparaná River, Rondônia.
  • Pama / Pamainá - language of an unknown tribe of the Caldeirão River, territory of Rondônia. (Unattested.)

Grammatical features

Body-part prefixation

Exceptional to Panoan languages' predominantly suffixal morphology are sets of approximately 30 morphemes primarily referring to parts or features of prototypical human and animal bodies (and, by analogical extension, of botanicals, manufactures, landscapes, and abstract space) which have been found to occur in almost all attested languages of the family (Fleck 2006: 59; Ferreira 2007, 2008; Amarante Ribeiro and Cândido 2008; Zariquiey and Fleck 2012: 385–386).

That these monosyllabic forms are productively affixed to the front of verbal, nominal, or adjectival roots has led many Panoanists to describe them as prefixes (e.g. Prost 1967 and Zingg 1998 [for Chakobo]; Faust 1973, Loriot et al. 1993, and Valenzuela 2003 [for Shipibo-Konibo]; Hyde 1980 [for Amawaka]; Eakin 1991[for Yaminawa]), while the forms' resemblance and loose semantic correspondence to unbound, polysyllabic 'body-part terms' has led others to describe them as incorporated nouns (e.g. Loos 1999). More recent and detailed analyses of this feature in Matses (Fleck 2006) and Kashibo-Kakataibo (Zariquiey and Fleck 2012) have demonstrated that most body-part prefixes in these languages are not readily analyzable as synchronic allomorphs of the nouns they resemble.

Many Panoan body-part prefixes semantically encompass a range of denotata beyond the strictly 'corporeal' by means of analogical extension. In Matses, for example, the prefix an- corresponds to the nouns ana 'mouth, tongue, palm (of hand), sole (of foot), (arm)pit'; anmaëşh 'gill slits (of fish)'; and anşhantuk 'swampy depression in the ground'; but can itself be glossed also as 'cavity, concave surface, interior, underside'; and 'center (of path of stream)' (Fleck 2006: 64). In the examples below, the prefix an- with the verb root kiad 'learn' expresses the learning of a specifically 'oral activity' while the prefix më- 'hand, mortar, forearm, wrist, projecting carpal bones, elbow, finger, knuckles, fingernail, branch' expresses the learning of a specifically 'manual' one:

an-kiad-o-bi

mouth-learn-PAST-1S

an-kiad-o-bi

mouth-learn-PAST-1S

'I learned with respect to (my) mouth', i.e., 'I learned an oral activity' (a language, to speak, a song, to sing, to recite the alphabet, to whistle, to eat a type of food, etc.) (Fleck 2006: 78)

më-kiad-o-bi

hand-learn-PAST-1S

më-kiad-o-bi

hand-learn-PAST-1S

'I learned to weave, write, do math problems, fire shotgun, fletch arrows, or other manual tasks' (Fleck 2006: 78)

The following example illustrates how an- can express locative information in non-corporeal, topographical space:

nëid-ø

this.one-ABS

an-san-aşh

center-put:PL.O-after:S/A>S

we-ta

lie-IMP

ø

3.ABS

ke-pa-ak

say-TOP.CONT-NARR.PAST

ka-denne-k

tell-REM.PAST.IND

ke-onda-şh

tell-DIST.PAST-3

nëid-ø an-san-aşh we-ta ø ke-pa-ak ka-denne-k ke-onda-şh

this.one-ABS center-put:PL.O-after:S/A>S lie-IMP 3.ABS say-TOP.CONT-NARR.PAST tell-REM.PAST.IND tell-DIST.PAST-3

'"Put this one in the middle [of the path] and then lie down!" he [the moon] said, they used to tell, I was told' (Fleck 2006: 80).

While body-part prefixes in Kashibo-Kakataibo, as in Matses, are highly productive with verbs, they are used regularly with only a modest array of adjectives and nouns (Fleck 2006: 72; Zariquiey and Fleck 2012: 394–5). Zariquiey and Fleck (2012: 394) note that the Kashibo-Kakataibo "words for 'skin', 'hair', and 'flesh'" are regularly prefixed:

kapë

caiman

të-şhaka

neck-skin.ABS

mëra-aşh

find-S/A>S

...

 

kapë të-şhaka mëra-aşh ...

caiman neck-skin.ABS find-S/A>S {}

'finding the caiman's neck skin ...' (Zariquiey and Fleck 2012: 395).

Due to the paucity of detailed studies of Panoan body-part prefixes, explanations of their grammaticalization remain largely speculative. Fleck has hypothesized that "Panoan (verb) prefixation evolved from past noun incorporation that co-existed with noun-noun and noun-adjective compounding that involved synchronic reduction of body-part roots" (2006: 92). In light of their analysis of Kashibo-Kakataibo prefixation, Zariquiey and Fleck present two diachronic scenarios to orient future comparative work: "(1) prefixation evolved from productive noun incorporation (prefixes have come from longer body-part nouns); or (2) Proto-Panoan body-part terms were monosyllabic forms that became bound, and most of the current body-part terms were later built up from these" (2012: 408).

Vocabulary

Loukotka (1968) lists the following basic vocabulary items.[7]

More information Language, Branch ...
More information Language, Branch ...

Proto-language

Quick Facts Proto-Panoan, Reconstruction of ...

Below are Proto-Panoan reconstructions by de Oliveira (2014).[8] For the full list of original Portuguese glosses, see the corresponding Portuguese article.

More information Proto-Panoan reconstructions by de Oliveira (2014), gloss ...

Bibliography

  • Amarante Ribeiro, Lincoln Almir, and Gláucia Viera Cândido. (2008). "A formação de palavras a partir de morfemas monossilábicos nominais e bases verbais em línguas indígenas da família Pano: Prefixação ou incorporação nominal?" Veredas On Line (UFJF) 1:129–45.
  • Campbell, Lyle. (1997). American Indian languages: The historical linguistics of Native America. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-509427-1.
  • Eakin, Lucille. (1991). "Lecciones Para el Aprendizaje del Idioma Yaminahua. Documento de Trabajo no. 22. Yarinacocha, Peru: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.
  • Faust, Norma. (1973). "Lecciones Para el Aprendizaje del Idioma Shipibo-Conibo." Documento de Trabajo no. 1. Yarinacocha, Peru: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.
  • Ferreira, Rogério Vincente. (2007). "Afixos verbais em uma lingua da familia Pano." V Congreso Internacional de Investigaciones Lingüísticos-Filológicas: La Enseñanza de la Lengua en el Tercer Milenio. Lima: Universidad Ricardo Palma.
  • Ferreira, Rogério Vincente. (2008). "Morfemas "partes do corpo" em Matis e algumas línguas da família Pano." Raído (Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados) 2, no. 4:35–39.
  • Fleck, David. (2006). "Body-part prefixes in Matses: Derivation or noun incorporation?" IJAL 72:59–96.
  • Hyde, Sylvia. (1980). "Diccionario Amahuaca" (Edición Preliminar). Serie Lingüística Peruana no. 7. Yarinacocha, Peru: Instituto Lingüístico Peruano.
  • Kaufman, Terrence. (1990). "Language history in South America: What we know and how to know more." In D. L. Payne (Ed.), Amazonian linguistics: Studies in lowland South American languages (pp. 13–67). Austin: University of Texas Press. ISBN 0-292-70414-3.
  • Kaufman, Terrence. (1994). "The native languages of South America." In C. Mosley & R. E. Asher (Eds.), Atlas of the world's languages (pp. 46–76). London: Routledge.
  • Loos, E.; Loos, B. (2003). Diccionario Capanahua-Castellano. Versión electrónica ilustrada. (Serie Lingüística Peruana, 45). Lima: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
  • Loos, Eugene E. (1999). "Pano." The Amazonian Languages, ed. R. M. W. Dixon and Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, pp. 227–49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Loriot, James; Erwin Lauriault; and Dwight Day. (1993). "Diccionario Shipibo–Castellano." Serie Lingüística Peruana no. 31. Yarinacocha, Peru: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.
  • Migliazza, Ernest C.; & Campbell, Lyle. (1988). "Panorama general de las lenguas indígenas en América". Historia general de América (Vol. 10). Caracas: Instituto Panamericano de Geografía e Historia.
  • Prost, Gilbert R. (1967). "Chacobo." Bolivian Indian Grammars: 1, ed. Esther Matteson, pp. 285–359. Norman: Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Oklahoma.
  • Rodrigues, Aryon. (1986). Linguas brasileiras: Para o conhecimento das linguas indígenas. São Paulo: Edições Loyola.
  • Scott, M. (2004). Vocabulario Sharanahua-Castellano. (Serie Lingüística Peruana, 53). Lima: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
  • Shell, Olive A. (1975). "Las lenguas pano y su reconstrucción". Serie Lingüística Peruana (No. 12). Yarinacocha, Peru: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.
  • Valenzuela, Pilar M. (2003). "Transitivity in Shipibo-Konibo grammar." Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene.
  • Zariquiey Biondi, Roberto and David W. Fleck. (2012). "Body-Part Prefixation in Kashibo-Kakataibo: Synchronic or Diachronic Derivation?" IJAL 78(3):385–409.
  • Zingg, Philipp. (1998). Diccionario Chácobo–Castellano Castellano–Chácobo con Bosquejo de la Gramática Chacobo y con Apuntes Culturales. La Paz, Bolivia: Ministerio de Desarrollo Sostenible y Planificación Viceministro de Asuntos Indígenas y Pueblos Originarios.

References

  1. Jolkesky, Marcelo Pinho De Valhery. 2016. Estudo arqueo-ecolinguístico das terras tropicais sul-americanas. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Brasília.
  2. Fleck, David. 2013. Panoan Languages and Linguistics. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History 99.
  3. Hammarström, Harald; Forkel, Robert; Haspelmath, Martin, eds. (2017). "Kontanawa". Glottolog 3.0. Jena, Germany: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History.
  4. Hammarström (2015) Ethnologue 16/17/18th editions: a comprehensive review: online appendices
  5. Amarante Ribeiro, Lincoln Almir (2005). Uma proposta de classificação interna das línguas da família Pano. Revista Investigações, v. 19, n. 2, p. 157-182.
  6. Oliveira, Sanderson Castro Soares de (2014). Contribuições para a reconstrução do Protopáno. Doctoral dissertation. Brasília: Universidade de Brasília.
  7. Loukotka, Čestmír (1968). Classification of South American Indian languages. Los Angeles: UCLA Latin American Center.
  8. Oliveira, S. C. Soares de (2014). Contribuições para a Reconstrução do Protopáno. PhD dissertation, Universidade de Brasília. Accessed from DiACL, 9 February 2020.

Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article Pano_languages, and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.