Perversion_for_Profit

<i>Perversion for Profit</i>

Perversion for Profit

1963 film

Perversion for Profit is a 1963[1] Eastmancolor propaganda film financed by Charles Keating through Citizens for Decent Literature and narrated by news reporter George Putnam. The film argues that sexually explicit materials corrupt young viewers and readers, leading to acts of violence and "perverted" attitudes regarding sex—including inclination toward homosexuality. Although Perversion for Profit was serious in its suggestion that pornography could erode the integrity of American culture, Peter L. Stein of the San Francisco Chronicle wrote in a 2003 review that it was "shrill and sometimes comical".[2]

Quick Facts Perversion for Profit, Produced by ...
Perversion for Profit part 1
Perversion for Profit part 2

Today, Perversion for Profit is in the public domain, and it has become popular on the Prelinger Archives website and on YouTube. As Peter L. Stein observes in an article for the San Francisco Chronicle, however, the film also has considerable historical significance, serving as a sort of time capsule of pornography from the era as well as an example of historical concerns regarding media influence:

... as the parade of girlie magazine covers, men's physique pictorials and campy S&M leaflets continues, the film betrays a kind of prurience the filmmakers could hardly have intended. What results is a remarkable visual record of midcentury underground literature and sexual appetites, and a gloss on the values of the society that condemned them.[2]

At the time the Chronicle article was written, Perversion was the Prelinger Archive's second most popular download, superseded only by the well-known Cold War film Duck and Cover. Like Stein, ephemeral film scholar Rick Prelinger, founder of the Archive, views such films as illuminating historical documents or what he calls "unofficial evidence of everyday life".[2]

Summary

In 1963, Putnam narrated Perversion for Profit, in which he warned viewers about magazines containing nudity and homosexual material, saying gay people were "perverted" and "misfits",[3] as well as implying they were child molesters, and that they weakened U.S. "resistance to the Communist masters of deceit."[3] The film was financed by Charles Keating.[2]

Allusions

Putnam erroneously cites the Supreme Court as having declared adult publications, "Dirt for dirt's sake." In actuality, that quote was from New York Court of Appeals judge John F. Scileppi and was in reference to Henry Miller's Tropic of Cancer (1961).

To support his position, Putnam refers to "Dr. [Pitirim] Sorokin, the renowned Harvard sociologist," a Russian-American who founded Harvard's Sociology department and served as the American Sociological Association's 55th president.[4]

To exemplify corrupting literature, Putnam reads a passage from the pulp fiction novel Sex Jungle (1960) by Don Elliot, a pseudonym for novelist Robert Silverberg.[5] In a 2000 interview, Silverberg explained that the erotic fiction that he published under the Don Elliot pseudonym ...

... was undertaken at a time when I was saddled with a huge debt, at the age of 26, for a splendid house that I had bought. There would have been no way to pay the house off by writing science fiction in that long-ago era, when $2500 was a lot to earn from a novel that might take months to write, so I turned out a slew of quick sex novels. I never concealed the fact that I was doing them; it made no difference at all to me whether people knew or not. It was just a job. And it was, incidentally, a job that I did very well. I think they were outstanding erotic novels.[6]

Broadcast

Turner Classic Movies has televised the film Saturday nights on its TCM Underground block.[7]

See also

References

  1. [1]
    Strub, Whitney (2013). Perversion for Profit: The Politics of Pornography and the Rise of the New Righ. Columbia University Press. p. 80. ISBN 9780231148870. Retrieved August 8, 2022.
  2. [2]
    Stein, Peter L. (August 31, 2003). "A Rejected Genre: Those kitschy and cautionary starchy industrial and educational films provide an Illuminating Peek at the Past 75 Years of American Culture". San Francisco Chronicle (August 31, 2003). Retrieved January 30, 2012.
  3. [3]
    Friedersdorf, Connor. "Pornography 'Weakens our Resistance to the Communist Masters of Deceit'". theatlantic.com. The Atlantic. Retrieved February 28, 2015. And then we come to a terribly sad indictment of our society – the so-called physique group of publications. These magazines with a homosexual viewpoint and poses are often not understood by many youngsters who take them as instruction of body development. But psychiatrists believe that prolonged exposure of even the normal male adult to this kind of publication, though he may not be aware of its true nature, will nevertheless pervert. Think then of the consequences to the inexperienced youth, who in purchasing and studying this material becomes a pawn for these misfits. These homosexuals, who have a slogan that betrays the evil of the breed: 'Today's conquest,' they say, 'is tomorrow's competition.
  4. [4]
    American Sociological Association. "Pitirim Aleksandrovich Sorokin". American Sociological Association. American Sociological Association. Archived from the original on April 18, 2012. Retrieved January 30, 2012.
  5. [5]
    "The Works of Robert Silverberg". The Quasi-Official Robert Silverberg Web Site. Retrieved January 30, 2012.
  6. [6]
    Horwich, David. "Interview: Robert Silverberg". Strange Horizons. Retrieved January 30, 2012.
  7. [7]
    "Perversion For Profit (1965) - Overview". Turner Classic Movies.

Further reading

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Perversion for Profit.
Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article Perversion_for_Profit, and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.