PubPeer

PubPeer

PubPeer

Scientific review website


PubPeer is a website that allows users to discuss and review scientific research after publication, i.e. post-publication peer review.

Quick Facts URL, Launched ...

The site has served as a whistleblowing platform, in that it highlighted shortcomings in several high-profile papers, in some cases leading to retractions and to accusations of scientific fraud,[1][2][3][4] as noted by Retraction Watch.[5] Contrary to most platforms, it allows anonymous post-publication commenting, a controversial feature which is the main factor for its success.[6] Consequently, accusations of libel have been levelled at some of PubPeer's users;[7][8] correspondingly the website has since 2016 told commentators to use only facts that can be publicly verified.[9]

See also


References

  1. "Researcher admits mistakes in stem cell study". Phys.org. May 2013.
  2. Sven Stockrahm; Lydia Klöckner; Dagny Lüdemann (2013-05-23). "Zellbiologe gibt Fehler in Klonstudie zu". Zeit.
  3. Paul Jump (13 November 2014). "Can post-publication peer review endure?". Times Higher Education. Retrieved 5 December 2014.
  4. Peer 0 (24 August 2014). "PubPeer's first legal threat" (blog). Retrieved 5 December 2014.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  5. "PubPeer - How to comment on PubPeer". pubpeer. Archived from the original on 15 November 2016. Retrieved 17 May 2017.

Further reading



Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article PubPeer, and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.