Sahlins–Obeyesekere_debate

Sahlins–Obeyesekere debate

Sahlins–Obeyesekere debate

Add article description

The Sahlins–Obeyesekere debate is an academic controversy in anthropology about the death of the British explorer James Cook, particularly whether the native Hawaiians believed him to be Lono, an akua "deity" associated with fertility, agriculture, rainfall, music and peace. The debate took shape in 1992, when Gananath Obeyesekere published The Apotheosis of Captain Cook, which criticized the work of Marshall Sahlins on the issue. In addition to the factual issues, the debate has become symbolic of deeper issues in anthropology, including whether Western scholars can understand non-Western cultures.[1][2][3][4]

Painting, Death of Captain Cook by eyewitness John Webber

References

  1. [1]
    Howe, K. R. (1996-06-01). "Review article: The making of cook's death". The Journal of Pacific History. 31 (1): 108–118. doi:10.1080/00223349608572810. ISSN 0022-3344.
  2. [2]
    Parker, Samuel K. (1995-03-01). "The Revenge of Practical Reason? A Review Essay On Gananath Obeyesekere's The Apotheosis of Captain Cook". Oceania. 65 (3): 257–267. doi:10.1002/j.1834-4461.1995.tb02507.x. ISSN 1834-4461.
  3. [3]
    Friedman, Jonathan (1997-02-01). "How "Natives" Think: About Captain Cook, For Example". American Ethnologist. 24 (1): 261–262. doi:10.1525/ae.1997.24.1.261. ISSN 1548-1425.
  4. [4]
    Borofsky, Robert (1997-04-01). "Cook, Lono, Obeyesekere, and Sahlins". Current Anthropology. 38 (2): 255–282. doi:10.1086/204608. JSTOR 10.1086/204608. S2CID 146866829.
Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article Sahlins–Obeyesekere_debate, and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.