Pure_Michigan_Byway

Pure Michigan Byway

Pure Michigan Byway

Segment of the State Trunkline Highway System


A Pure Michigan Byway is the designation for a segment of the State Trunkline Highway System in the US state of Michigan that is a "scenic, recreational, or historic route that is representative of Michigan's natural and cultural heritage."[2] The designation was created with the name Michigan Heritage Route by the state legislature on June 22, 1993, and since then six historic, seven recreational and seven scenic byways have been designated by the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT), and another two have been proposed. These byways have been designated in both the Upper and Lower peninsulas (UP, LP) of the state. The current name was adopted on December 30, 2014, and it references the Pure Michigan tourism marketing campaign.

Quick Facts System information, Length ...

To be listed as a Pure Michigan Byway, a road must be a state trunkline highway, and it must be nominated through a two-stage process. Candidates are evaluated based on a set of objective criteria by MDOT in a process that can take several years to complete. The criteria include a highway's relationship to sites or districts on the National Register of Historic Places, to recreational areas, or to scenic landscapes. Each candidate must be supported by local stakeholders, including the appropriate local units of government. Each byway has a local organization that produces a management plan for the roadway and the preservation of its surrounding environment.

Program

According to MDOT, the department's Pure Michigan Byway Program works with local communities, organizations, and government agencies to identify roads that access Michigan's "unique recreational, scenic and historic cultural treasures".[3] The program also attempts to preserve the unique and irreplaceable qualities of selected corridors, improve distinct roads in a careful and considerate way, and promote a greater awareness of and appreciation for the state's scenic, recreational, historical and cultural resources, according to the Federal Highway Administration. These actions provide economic benefits by stimulating tourism.[4] Staffers for State Representative Peter Pettalia of Presque Isle said that the point of the program, in context of the 2014 change to the Pure Michigan Byway name, was to get people to drive the selected roads and spend money at local businesses.[5]

Additions to the system are made when local organizations apply to MDOT through a two-stage process. First, a local organization proposes the addition, verifying that the suggested byway is a state trunkline highway and noting which local governments support the designation. MDOT reviews this pre-application to determine initial eligibility. If the proposed byway is determined to be eligible, the organization is asked to submit a full application to the department for approval.[6] The full process can take up to seven years to complete.[7] The MDOT director compiles a report annually that is submitted to the governor, members of the Michigan Legislature and members of the State Transportation Commission; this report details any new additions in the previous year and any changes or deletions affecting the system.[8]

Types and requirements

The three types of byways are defined in Public Act 69 of 1993, the legislation that originally established the system. The Legislature defined these types to be:

Historic
significant to the history, archeology, architecture, engineering, or culture of this state.
Recreational
facilities normally associated with leisure-time activities, including, but not limited to, parks, public access sites, wildlife refuges, forest areas, marinas, swimming areas, hiking trails, and sightseeing areas.
Scenic
an area of outstanding natural beauty whose features include, but are not limited to, significant natural features such as vegetation, land form, water, and open areas with exceptional vistas and views, that singly or in combination make that area unique and distinct in character.[2]

In his annual report to the State Legislature at the end of 2014, MDOT Director Kirk Steudle described an additional three categories of byway not listed in the legislation setting up the system.

Cultural
A state highway traversing an area with unique cultural and/or ethnic heritage amenities such as art galleries, theaters, opera houses, restaurants, markets, and music venues.
Archaeological
A state highway traversing a corridor with ruins, artifacts, and structural remains.
Natural
A state highway that traverses a corridor with natural features that are relatively undisturbed, unique geological landforms, vegetation, water bodies, or conservation areas.[9]

In establishing specific objective criteria related to the selection of potential byways, MDOT has set up limitations on these classifications. Regardless of classification, all byways are supported with a management plan for the corridor designed to deal with protection, preservation, and enhancement of the roadway. All routes are given specific termini points with a reasonable length. They must also have the backing of local units of government, landowners and organizations.[10] No specific criteria have been published for cultural, archaeological or natural byways.[9]

Historic byways are assessed based on the numbers of sites listed, or eligible for listing, on the National Register of Historic Places. These sites need to be visible from the route of the byway, or, in the case of historic districts, a "substantial portion of the district must lie adjacent to the highway".[10] Local organizations backing a proposed historic byway must also have promotional plans and demonstrate coordination with state agencies related to state history.[10]

Recreational byways must be used mainly for recreational purposes, connecting to one or more recreation sites. They can also connect multiple sites together with a common theme, and they are assessed on their scenic qualities with lower inclusion standards than scenic byways.[10]

Scenic byways must exclude commercial or industrial zones adjacent to the trunkline. These roads are also assessed on qualities such as the uniqueness, vividness, intactness, unity, and viewshed of the roadway and its surrounding environment as set up in department guidelines.[10]

History

Michigan Heritage Route signage
Before the system's name was changed in 2014, these signs were used for Historic, Recreational and Scenic Heritage Routes; new signs were unveiled in October 2015.

The Michigan Heritage Route System was created after Public Act 69 of 1993 was signed into law on June 22, 1993, going into effect immediately. The law required MDOT to set up specific criteria and procedures related to selecting and maintaining heritage routes, subject to approval of the Legislature.[2] Since the program was put into operation in 1993, 16 heritage routes have been approved by the department. The first two were approved in 1995 at opposite ends of the state: a scenic route along US Highway 41 (US 41) in the Keweenaw Peninsula region of the northern UP[11][12] and a historic route along M-125 in downtown Monroe in the southeastern corner of the LP.[13][14] The first recreational route was approved in 1998 along M-15 in the southeastern LP.[15] Since 2008, local groups have proposed the creation of a heritage route along the former West Michigan Pike (US 31) on the western side of the LP[7] and a loop around Ontonagon County in the western UP.[8][16] In a department report dated December 22, 2014, the UP byway was no longer under active proposal,[9] and the West Michigan Pike was dedicated on July 25, 2016.[17]

The Legislature proposed another change to the system in 2013 to rename the Heritage Routes in the system to Pure Michigan Byways under a bill introduced in the state House of Representatives.[18] The bill passed in the House in March 2014,[5] and the state Senate during the lame duck session in December 2014.[19] Sponsors of the bill said that including the highways in the Pure Michigan tourism advertising campaign would provide promotional benefits, and they stated that the change "allows the state to comply with federal changes, which require the word 'route' be changed to 'byway'."[5] The bill received the governor's signature and was filed on December 30, 2014,[20] taking effect as Public Act 445 that day. MDOT had one year from that effective date to obtain a trademark license from the Michigan Economic Development Corporation, owners of the Pure Michigan trademark, and to unveil the new signage bearing the updated program name.[21] They unveiled the new signage as part of the dedication of the M-134 North Huron Byway in October 2015.[22]

List

There are six historic, seven recreational and six scenic byways in Michigan, with one additional route proposed.

More information Type, Name ...

See also

Michigan has three National Forest Scenic Byways that run along county roads and a National Park Service-maintained scenic drive, which are ineligible to be Pure Michigan Byways:


References

  1. Michigan Department of Transportation (2021). Next Generation PR Finder (Map). Michigan Department of Transportation. Retrieved October 11, 2021.
  2. Michigan Legislature (June 22, 1993). "Public Act 69 of 1993: Michigan Heritage Routes" (PDF). Michigan Compiled Laws. Michigan Legislative Council. p. 1. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 18, 2014. Retrieved July 14, 2012.
  3. Michigan Department of Transportation (n.d.). "Drive Home Our Heritage". Highway Programs. Michigan Department of Transportation. Archived from the original on August 16, 2014. Retrieved January 7, 2012.
  4. Federal Highway Administration (n.d.). "Michigan: State Program". National Scenic Byway Program. Federal Highway Administration. Archived from the original on April 14, 2013. Retrieved July 14, 2012.
  5. Lehndorff, Becky (March 27, 2014). "Route US 23 Closer to Becoming Part of Pure Michigan Campaign". The Alpena News. Archived from the original on October 20, 2014. Retrieved October 14, 2014.
  6. Michigan Department of Transportation (August 20, 2010). "How to Apply". Highway Programs. Michigan Department of Transportation. Archived from the original on August 16, 2014. Retrieved October 14, 2014.
  7. "Will Old US 31 Become a Michigan Heritage Route?". The Muskegon Chronicle. Chronicle News Service. March 31, 2008. Archived from the original on April 15, 2014. Retrieved April 13, 2014.
  8. Steudle, Kirk T. (April 24, 2014). "Annual Report on the Status of Michigan's Heritage Route Program" (PDF). Letter to Rick Snyder, Members of the Michigan State Legislature and Members of the Michigan State Transportation Commission. Lansing: Michigan Department of Transportation. Archived (PDF) from the original on August 16, 2014. Retrieved October 14, 2014.
  9. Steudle, Kirk T. (December 22, 2014). "Annual Report on the Status of Michigan's Heritage Route Program" (PDF). Letter to Rick Snyder, Members of the Michigan State Legislature and Members of the Michigan State Transportation Commission. Lansing: Michigan Department of Transportation. Archived (PDF) from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved January 15, 2015.
  10. Michigan Heritage Route Program (n.d.). Selection Criteria (PDF). Michigan Department of Transportation. Archived (PDF) from the original on March 5, 2014. Retrieved October 14, 2014.
  11. Federal Highway Administration (n.d.). "Copper Country Trail: Official Designations". America's Byways. Federal Highway Administration. Archived from the original on June 21, 2013. Retrieved July 14, 2012.
  12. Federal Highway Administration (n.d.). "Monroe Street (M-125)". America's Byways. Federal Highway Administration. Archived from the original on October 18, 2011. Retrieved July 14, 2012.
  13. Federal Highway Administration (n.d.). "Monroe Street (M-125): Official Designations". America's Byways. Federal Highway Administration. Archived from the original on December 30, 2011. Retrieved July 14, 2012.
  14. Eastern Michigan Council of Governments (2013). M-15 Recreation Heritage Route Revised Management Plan. M-15 Heritage Route Management Committee. pp. 4, 7, 9.
  15. Michigan Department of Transportation (n.d.). Michigan Byways (PDF) (Map). Scale not given. Lansing: Michigan Department of Transportation. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 21, 2012. Retrieved June 19, 2014.
  16. Witt, Jeremy (July 22, 2016). "State's Newest Michigan Byway to be Designated on Monday". West Michigan Tourist Association. Retrieved July 23, 2016.
  17. Hubbard, Brandon (November 15, 2013). "Iconic State Highways Could Get Pure Michigan Name Change". Petoskey News-Review. Archived from the original on October 14, 2014. Retrieved October 14, 2014.
  18. Michigan Legislature (n.d.). "House Bill 5072 (2013)". Michigan Legislative Council. Archived from the original on February 10, 2015. Retrieved December 17, 2014.
  19. Wurfel, Sara & Murray, Dave (December 31, 2014). "Gov. Rick Snyder Signs Bills Focused on Creating Good Government Practices: Also Signs Memorial Highway, 'Pure Michigan Byways' Bills" (Press release). Office of the Governor. Archived from the original on January 3, 2015. Retrieved January 1, 2015.
  20. Michigan Legislature (December 30, 2014). "Public Act 445 of 2014" (PDF). Michigan Legislative Council. p. 222. Retrieved January 23, 2015.
  21. "M-134 in UP Tapped as Pure Michigan's First Byway". Detroit Free Press. Associated Press. October 14, 2015. Archived from the original on August 19, 2016. Retrieved October 15, 2015.
  22. Maxwell, Terrion (October 23, 1997). "Bay City Receives Historic Heritage Route Designation" (Press release). Michigan Department of Transportation. Archived from the original on December 12, 2008. Retrieved May 10, 2008.
  23. Center Avenue Heritage Route Trust (n.d.). "Center Avenue Heritage Route (M-25)" (Map). Heritage Route Application, Appendix B: Regional and Route Location Maps. Scale not given. Bay City, Michigan: Center Avenue Heritage Route Trust.
  24. Daly, Matthew L.; Herman, Jennifer L. & Hannan, Caryn, eds. (2008). Michigan Encyclopedia. Vol. 1. Hamburg, Michigan: State History Publications. p. 99. ISBN 978-1-8785-9294-1. OCLC 226317449.
  25. Randall, Gary L. (February 3, 1999). "House Chamber, Lansing, Wednesday, February 3, 1999". Journal of the House of Representatives, 90th Legislature. Archived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved August 4, 2013.
  26. Township of Yankee Springs (n.d.). Chief Noonday Trail Corridor Map (Map). Scale not given. Township of Yankee Springs.
  27. Google (February 8, 2011). "Overview Map of M-179" (Map). Google Maps. Google. Retrieved February 8, 2011.
  28. "US 23 Heritage Route Gets Official Designation". Iosco County News-Herald. East Tawas, Michigan. May 12, 2004. Archived from the original on July 8, 2019. Retrieved July 14, 2012.
  29. Northeast Michigan Council of Governments & East Central Michigan Planning and Development Regional Commission (2009). US 23 Huron Shores Heritage Route Management Plan. Northeast Michigan Council of Governments.
  30. Baker, Gary (October 9, 2004). "Stretch of I-69 Designated as MDOT Recreation Heritage Route". Coldwater Daily Reporter. News section. ISSN 0745-6794. OCLC 9399135.
  31. I-69 Recreation Heritage Route Management Team (n.d.). "Attachment A: Narrative Description of Proposed Route". I-69 Recreation Heritage Route Application. I-69 Recreation Heritage Route Management Team. p. 1.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  32. Western UP Planning & Development (October 2013). "Figure 2: Corridor Map" (Map). Iron County Heritage Trail Corridor Management Plan. Scale not given. Iron River, Michigan: Friends of the Iron County Heritage Trail. pp. 1, 7.
  33. Nelson, Steve (July 27, 2000). "Designation of the Iron County Heritage Trail". Letter to Margaret Barondess. Crystal Falls, Michigan: Michigan State University Extension.
  34. Leelanau Scenic Heritage Route Committee (n.d.). "The Leelanau Scenic Heritage Route" (PDF). Northwest Michigan Council of Governments. p. 6. Archived from the original on December 31, 2014. Retrieved July 14, 2012.
  35. "M-22 Designated Pure Michigan Byway". Manistee County Press. October 6, 2016. Archived from the original on February 6, 2017. Retrieved January 6, 2017.
  36. Eppley, Jonathan (October 23, 2008). "Plan Would Make M-134 a Heritage Route: Regional Planning Commission Sees Economic Benefits". St. Ignace News. p. A1. OCLC 36250796. Archived from the original on July 24, 2014. Retrieved July 14, 2012.
  37. North Huron Recreational Heritage Route Advisory Committee (2010). North Huron Recreational Heritage Route Corridor Management Plan (PDF). Eastern UP Regional Planning & Development Commission. Archived (PDF) from the original on August 13, 2016. Retrieved October 22, 2014.
  38. Hinde, Jill (January 12, 2001). "West Michigan Avenue Designated as a Michigan Heritage Route". The Marshall Chronicle. p. 1. Retrieved August 11, 2018 via NewspaperArchive.com.
  39. "Marshall's Michigan Avenue Honored as Michigan Heritage Route (Historic)". The Marshall Chronicle. October 29, 2001. p. 15. Retrieved August 11, 2018 via NewspaperArchive.com.
  40. City of Monroe (2000). "Year 2000 Nomination Form". Monroe Historic Heritage Route Corridor Management Plan. City of Monroe.
  41. National Park Service (November 11, 2009). "National Register Information System". National Register of Historic Places. National Park Service. Retrieved October 14, 2014.
  42. Skinner, Victor (March 7, 2008). "M-37 on Old Mission Designated Scenic Route". Traverse City Record-Eagle. OCLC 30098364. Archived from the original on March 21, 2014. Retrieved August 15, 2013.
  43. Northwest Michigan Council of Governments & Michigan Center for Geographic Information (September 1, 2000). "M-37 Proposed Heritage Route" (Map). Old Mission Peninsula Scenic Heritage Route. Scale not given. Traverse City, Michigan: M-37 Scenic Heritage Route Nominating Team. pp. 6, 22.
  44. Graham, David V. (July 8, 1998). "Road Less Traveled Getting Some Respect: M-15, Old 'Up North' Route Gets State Designation". The Flint Journal. p. C1. OCLC 9974225.
  45. Lake, James (November 9, 2007). "M-123 Tahquamenon Scenic Heritage Route Expanded" (Press release). Michigan Department of Transportation. Archived from the original on October 7, 2012. Retrieved June 19, 2014.
  46. Tahquamenon Scenic Heritage Route Committee (2007). Tahquamenon Scenic Heritage Route Management Plan (PDF). Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan: Eastern UP Regional Planning & Development Commission. p. 2. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 27, 2014. Retrieved June 19, 2014.
  47. Tahquamenon Scenic Heritage Route Committee (n.d.). "The Tahquamenon Scenic Byway: 63 Miles, Endless Memories" (PDF). Eastern UP Regional Planning & Development Commission. Retrieved May 28, 2015.
  48. Kent, AnnMarie (October 9, 2017). "UP Highway Named Newest Pure Michigan Byway". UpNorthLive. Traverse City, Michigan: WPBN-TV. Archived from the original on October 9, 2017. Retrieved October 12, 2017.
  49. Gray, Fred (June 26, 2003). "Scenic Heritage Route Dedicated Saturday". Petoskey News-Review. Archived from the original on October 27, 2014. Retrieved August 4, 2013.
  50. M-119 Tunnel of Trees Scenic Heritage Route Committee (2008). "M-119 Scenic Views" (Map). M-119 Tunnel of Trees Scenic Heritage Route Management Plan Update. Scale not given. Traverse City, Michigan: Northwest Michigan Council of Governments.{{cite map}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  51. "MDOT Declares UP Road as Heritage Route". Negaunee, Michigan: WLUC-TV. August 28, 2007.
  52. UP Hidden Coast Recreation Heritage Route Planning Committee (September 2013). "Chapter 1: Introduction". UP Hidden Coast Recreation Heritage Route Management Plan. Escanaba, Michigan: Central Upper Peninsula Planning and Development Regional Commission. pp. 1–2.
  53. Barnett, LeRoy (2004). A Drive Down Memory Lane: The Named State and Federal Highways of Michigan. Allegan Forest, Michigan: Priscilla Press. pp. 51, 288. ISBN 1-886167-24-9. OCLC 57425393.
  54. SmithGroup JJR & Michigan State University Department of Park, Recreation and Tourism Resources (December 2003). US 12 Historic Heritage Trail Application & Corridor Management Plan. US 12 Heritage Trail Council. pp. ES‑1, 1‑3.
  55. "West Michigan Pike Noted as a Historic Byway, Tourist Draw". Grand Rapids, Michigan: WOOD-TV. Associated Press. July 25, 2016. Retrieved July 25, 2016.
  56. Ballou, Brian (August 4, 1999). "Woodward Winner Storied Avenue Labeled a Michigan Heritage Road: Plans In Works For Continuous Identity From Detroit To Pontiac". Detroit Free Press. p. B1. ISSN 1055-2758. OCLC 10345127, 137343179. Retrieved July 13, 2018 via Newspapers.com.
  57. Tamboer, Andrea (October 28, 2009). "Woodward Avenue (M-1) Gets All-American Road Designation". MLive. Detroit: Booth Newspapers. Archived from the original on October 27, 2014. Retrieved July 14, 2012.
  58. Southeast Michigan Council of Governments (1998). "Woodward Avenue Heritage Route Designation" (Map). Woodward Avenue Heritage Route Management Plan. Scale not given. Detroit: Southeast Michigan Council of Governments. p. 9.
KML is from Wikidata


Share this article:

This article uses material from the Wikipedia article Pure_Michigan_Byway, and is written by contributors. Text is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 International License; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.