Meta’s factchecker cut has sparked controversy – but the real threat is AI and neurotechnology

While Meta’s decision to drop fact-checkers has drawn sharp criticism, the real concern lies in the unchecked power of AI and neurotechnology.

Rafael Weber Hoss, PhD Candidate in Intelligence Technologies and Digital Design, Cardiff Metropolitan University • conversation
Jan. 15, 2025 ~5 min

Meta shift from fact-checking to crowdsourcing spotlights competing approaches in fight against misinformation and hate speech

Content moderation is a thorny issue, often pitting safety against free speech. But does it even work, and which approach is best?

Anjana Susarla, Professor of Information Systems, Michigan State University • conversation
Jan. 15, 2025 ~7 min


‘What is a fact?’ A humanities class prepares STEM students to be better scientists

A professor shows science students how humanities classes are the real stem that other disciplines sprout from. They learn that critical thinking and skepticism don’t stop when they leave the lab.

Timothy Morton, Rita Shea Guffey Chair of English, Rice University • conversation
April 30, 2024 ~4 min

People dig deeper to fact-check social media posts when paired with someone who doesn't share their perspective – new research

A new study unexpectedly found a way to help people assess social media posts with less bias and more care – pairing them up with partners who have a different perspective.

Eli Gottlieb, Senior Fellow in Education and Human Development, George Washington University • conversation
Nov. 9, 2023 ~5 min

ChatGPT is great – you're just using it wrong

ChatGPT and other AI chatbots are remarkably good at answering your questions. Just don’t take the answers seriously. Sometimes, though, potentially fact-free answers are just fine.

Jonathan May, Research Associate Professor of Computer Science, University of Southern California • conversation
Feb. 2, 2023 ~8 min

Why is astronomy a science but astrology is not?

Astrology and astronomy were once practiced side by side by scientists like Galileo and Kepler. And they’re more similar than you might think.

Carl Craver, Professor of Philosophy and Philosophy-Neuroscience-Psychology, Arts & Sciences at Washington University in St. Louis • conversation
Dec. 19, 2022 ~8 min

How fake science websites hijack our trust in experts to misinform and confuse

Bogus science articles are attempting to take advantage of our trust in experts.

Isobelle Clarke, Leverhulme Trust Early Career Research Fellow, Lancaster University • conversation
Sept. 12, 2022 ~7 min

YouTube: how a team of scientists worked to inoculate a million users against misinformation

The study is the largest of its kind. Researchers hope it could be a breakthrough in the fight against misinformation.

Stephan Lewandowsky, Chair of Cognitive Psychology, University of Bristol • conversation
Aug. 24, 2022 ~9 min


Cognitive biases and brain biology help explain why facts don’t change minds

Here are some reasons for the natural human tendency to avoid or reject new information that runs counter to what you already know – and some tips on how to do better.

Keith M. Bellizzi, Professor of Human Development and Family Sciences, University of Connecticut • conversation
Aug. 11, 2022 ~8 min

Emotion is a big part of how you assess risk – and why it's so hard to be objective about pandemic precautions

How you respond to a risk depends on how you weigh the costs and benefits of an action. The problem is you’re not just a logical computer, and emotions bias your interpretation of the facts.

Sheldon H. Jacobson, Professor of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign • conversation
Aug. 12, 2021 ~9 min

/

2