If it looks like a dire wolf, is it a dire wolf? How to define a species is a scientific and philosophical question

Figuring out whether de-extinction is possible is as much a technical puzzle as a philosophical one. Add two kinds of DNA to the mix, and it gets even more complex.

Elay Shech, Professor of Philosophy, Auburn University • conversation
May 30, 2025 ~12 min

Colors are objective, according to two philosophers − even though the blue you see doesn’t match what I see

An object’s color appears differently under different lighting and against different backgrounds − for different viewers. But that doesn’t mean colors are subjective.

Michael Watkins, Professor of Philosophy, Auburn University • conversation
April 25, 2025 ~9 min


Multiple goals, multiple solutions, plenty of second-guessing and revising − here’s how science really works

Unrealistic, outdated ideas that idealize science can set the public up to distrust scientists and the research process. A philosopher of science describes 3 aspects of how science really gets done.

Soazig Le Bihan, Professor of Philosophy, University of Montana • conversation
Aug. 7, 2024 ~10 min

Intellectual humility is a key ingredient for scientific progress

An intellectually humble person may have strong commitments to various beliefs − but balanced with an openness to the likelihood that others, too, may have valuable insights, ideas and evidence.

Michael Dickson, Professor of Philosophy, University of South Carolina • conversation
Dec. 6, 2023 ~10 min

Should we really believe scientific facts will last forever when history is full of revolutions in thinking?

Two simple rules can help us identify future-proof science.

Peter Vickers, Professor in Philosophy of Science, Durham University • conversation
Sept. 14, 2022 ~9 min

Politicized science drove lunar exploration and Stalinist pseudoscience – but polarized scientific views are worse than ever

Politics always influences what questions scientists ask. Their intertwined relationship becomes a problem when politics dictates what answers science is allowed to find.

Liv Grjebine, Postdoctoral Fellow in History of Science, Harvard University • conversation
May 26, 2021 ~8 min

Coronavirus: why it's dangerous to blindly 'follow the science' when there's no consensus yet

If expert advice on the pandemic turns out to be wrong, it will have dire consequences for how reliable scientific evidence is treated in other policy areas, such as climate change.

Eric Winsberg, Professor of Philosophy of Science, University of South Florida • conversation
June 18, 2020 ~7 min

/

1