Summary

Licensing

I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following licenses:

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License , Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation ; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled GNU Free Documentation License . http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html GFDL GNU Free Documentation License true true

This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported , 2.5 Generic , 2.0 Generic and 1.0 Generic license.

You are free:

• to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
• to remix – to adapt the work

Under the following conditions:

• attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
• share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0 CC BY-SA 3.0 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 true true

You may select the license of your choice.

I can only presume that Rosa 'Eden Rose' is a variety as it is written in classical variety format ...I see no sign that it is a trademark

   How can Rosa 'Eden Rose' be synonymous with a trademark ie Pierre de Ronsard ? If  a variety is synonymous (ie also known as )with a trademark then the trademark is invalid ....this is basic trademark law